Home // Daily Archive for July 2nd, 2014
 

The Thinking Housewife and Pythagoras And The Esote ... July 2, 2014

I recently came across the blog of Laura Wood which she has named The Thinking Housewife.   One of her many articles which caught my attention was The Pythagorean Women.   Knowing that I could provide the insight into what I portray as the Esoteric Feminine Mystique that our modern culture remains totally ignorant of today, I decided to send off the below email to Laura.  As stated, that our culture attempts to recreate woman into a surrogate man — with the almost total loss of her true feminine strengths and powers of intellect and spiritual purpose — is perhaps the greatest folly of mankind today.  The plight of modern man because of his suppression of the Feminine-Intuitive, has intellectually flat-lined him in the abyss of abject self-ignorance.   And this is demonstrated in my assertion that our modern institutions forces women as surrogate-men, into a type of mental-burka that has been the detriment to all of mankind as a whole — as stated in my following paragraph copied from my affidavit provided for those who oppose wearing a seat belt (see Affidavit): 

The proper development of the mind to eclipse what can be called organic human limitations, is dependent upon the interaction of the linear and intuitive spheres of mind.   But when the intuitive perception is inhibited, and development is suppressed, even the linear is flat-lined from any development beyond what is portrayed in the Gospels as carnal and restricted consciousness.    The linear mind of man remains limited in its development, because the intuitive remains infantile and shackled in a captive environment where it is only permitted to express itself in linear terms.  While the inward looking intuitive has the potential to access higher consciousness and states of mind and being, it is unable to arise to its intended potential because of the shackles placed upon it by a thoroughly domineering and controlling linear culture.    Like a woman who in many Islamic cultures are forced to dwell in an imprisoned world beneath a Burka — not permitted to openly express herself except when accompanied by a male relative — totally deprived of the ability to openly speak on her own behalf — the natural expression of the intuitive mind has been so impeded by our linear-driven culture, that it has remained undeveloped and unreliable as a resource (see Opening And Unlocking the Mind).    

The following is my communication with Laura Wood and her Thinking Housewife blog:
 
Greetings, and Shalom Laura Wood:
I just came across your blog entitled The Thinking Housewife ( http://ThinkingHouseWife.com ), and I find myself in agreement with much of what you write.   So, I am putting your web address across my Nazirene Disciple Forum in the hope that some of the membership will read some of the concepts in your articles and discuss them on the forum.    
In your article The Pythagorean Women you write: Granted, much of what is known about their community is uncertain. The sect observed a code of secrecy. But, it appears to have embodied some of the most enlightened and wholesome ideas about the role of women in Western history. Pythagoras opened his learned society to women, who were free to philosophize and pursue arcane studies. At the same time, Pythagoras did not believe in masculinized women; he perceived the difference in male and female functions.   If you will accept it, I know quite a bit about the secret knowledge of the Pythagorean spiritual community — and if I might point out that much of this secret knowledge parallels that of the inner core of the original Ebionite Nazirene disciples of Jesus with respect to women — and like the historical man Jesus, what Pythagoras was seeking was Wholeness as portrayed at the subheading The Esoteric Feminine Mystique.   

Quoting from the subheading, The Intuitive Mind Vs The Linear Rational: In the introduction to the book Secrets of Mary Magdalene, Prof. Elain Pageles writes and quotes the Gospel of Philip: Simultaneously, the Gospel of Philip celebrates Mary Magdalene as manifesting the divine spirit, which this gospel calls the “virgin who came down” from heaven. When Christians spoke of Jesus “born from a virgin,” this author agrees—but refuses to take it literally. So some people, he says, take this literally to mean that Jesus’ mother became pregnant apart from any man, apart from sexual intercourse. But this, he says, is the “faith of fools” who fail to comprehend spiritual matters (although, as we note, it can be seen in the birth narratives offered in the New Testament gospels of Matthew and Luke). Instead, continues the Gospel of Philip, Jesus was born physically, just as all humans, as the son of biological parents. The difference, says the author of this gospel, that he was also “born again” in baptism–born spiritually to become the son of the Father above, and of the heavenly Mother, the Holy Spirit.   That one of the primary objectives of this life is to bring about and achieve the next stage of birth — a non-physical birth which is allegorically portrayed as a Virgin Birth — should be of primary importance to all people.   
In the same way that Peter as representing the (male) linear-rational spheres of mind states of the intuitive visions and wisdom of Mary Magdalene:  “…These are certainly strange ideas”, it is a fact that it is the lopsided development of what Einstein portrayed as the linear-rational servant that inhibits the development of the intuitive-gift — i.e., as seen in Einstein’s statement that “The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.”     Without the balanced development of the intuitive, the linear-rational which only senses outwardly, arrives as a point where it becomes what can be portrayed as flat-lined — which in turn inhibits the further development of the linear rational servant from itself maturing beyond organic limitations.   And herein lies the great obstacle to human development that linear-intellectuals don’t at all understand — i.e., the reality that the linear programming of the mind which is the agenda of our educational systems — including the reading of books and traditional study — only serves to inhibit the development of the intuitive spheres of mind — and it is the lack of balance between the inward looking intuitive and the outward looking linear-rational that inhibits the development of the mind beyond a certain very shallow organic physical level of maturity.    Further, what we are presented with are a number of paradoxes that have confronted man since he first stepped foot on the earth.   Thus, these proverbial questions must be confronted: Is the mind of a child empty?   Or, does a great source of knowledge already exist within the mind of the child that must be tapped into?   Do you instruct a child through rote programming in the manner of our educational systems today?   Or do you guide the child into an environment of self-discovery?
The problem is seen in the fact that the linear-rational servant can only look outwardly — and not only remains totally ignorant of an inner reality that it is blind to — but it demands that all of mankind ignore and even reject the higher causal reality that can only be sensed and understood through the development of the intuitive centers of mind.   Like the tip of the proverbial iceberg, what is observed protruding out of the water is very small in relation to the immense body of ice that is beyond man’s normal scope of vision lying beneath the water line.   And because our culture and linear learning environment actually inhibits the development of the intuitive, it remains atrophied and latently embryonic and immature.   This is seen in the fact that when the leaders of the Jews (Pharisees) asked Jesus when the Kingdom of God would come upon the earth in the manner that they believed it would, he told them that it would never come upon the earth so as to be seen with their eyes (that look outwardly), because the Kingdom already exists within them (see http://GateOfEden.com ) — and it is accessed through the development of the intuitive spheres of mind that are positioned to look inwardly — which then must be balanced with the outward looking rational linear.
   
In your article you write: The Pythagorean woman may have achieved the true golden mean. She was learned. She was respected for her intellectual potential. But, she never sacrificed for these her fidelity to husband and home. To a Pythagorean, mind is not separate from soul. Our powers of reason are related to our efforts toward virtue. Here is one of the greatest insights of Greek thought. Here is the kernel of Western progress. The true and the good and the beautiful are one.  I hope the above clarifies for you the reason why the Pythagorean spiritual communities “…respected [woman] for her intellectual potential”.    
I am presently putting together my presentation at the upcoming Conference For Consciousness And Human Evolution  (see http://www.tcche.org/ ) — which will be entitled “Know Thyself – The Higher Reality Of The Soul And The Cosmology Of Mind And Being” — which presentation I am compiling on the website The Holographic Divine Pattern.   Pythagoras, as with all truly enlightened men of Wisdom and Spiritual Knowledge, understood the important role that women and the development of the Intuitive Spheres of Mind plays in the seeking the Higher Destiny of Mankind.  With respect to your statement “…The sect observed a code of secrecy” — it wasn’t so much that they concealed knowledge from those outside the community — but rather, as stated by the biblical authors, it remains virtually impossible for men of a “natural” organic consciousness to comprehend the higher reality of the soul and the mysteries of the Kingdom (see Mysteries).   With respect to your statement: “…Pythagoras did not believe in masculinized women” — the downfall of our modern culture is presented at the subheading The Opening And Unlocking Of The Mind, which demonstrates the importance of the dynamic balance that must be achieved between the minds of men and woman — and the cultural attempt to recast women as surrogate men.             
Hope the above provides you some insight into the women of Pythagoras and other Highly Advanced Spiritual Communities. 
Allan Cronshaw

aka Brother of Yeshua
http://Cronshaw.us 

0

Posted by on Jul 2, 2014

 

Larry Stone – The Folly Of Your Noah Article ... July 2, 2014

The below is a letter that I sent to World Net Daily (WND) in reply to their article on the movie Noah.  In view of the fact that WND would reject the truth and the facts with respect to the issue of the wholesale Corruption of the Church, faith-based believers can find the facts in the below reply which I did send Larry Stone c/o WND. 

Shalom Larry Stone:
After reading your article Noah Revives Ancient Enemy Of Christianity, the only statement in your article that has any factual truth is the statement:“In the second-century, Irenaeus called the Gospel of Judas ‘fictitious history'”. Why is this the lone factual statement in your article?   Because neither the Gospel of Judas, or any of the other Gospels, are representative of historical accounts.   In the same way that the Pharisees were condemned by Jesus as “blind guides” who were leading the people in the wrong direction, because the Church in like manner threw away the Key of Knowledge (see http://KeyOfKnowledge.org ), the blind leaders of the Church have spiritually disenfranchised the congregation of faith-based believers to the degree that it can be accurately said that they dwell in a self-imposed Spiritual Diaspora.   The Gospels — as with all scriptures — are composed with a quasi-historical cloak, so that they will be somewhat relevant to the mindset and thinking of entry-level faith-based Christians who are yet too spiritually immature to understand the higher reality of the soul and the Mysteries of the Kingdom (see Opening The Eyes Of The Heart).   Quoting from the foregoing article:
In the original biblical Greek the knowledge of man was portrayed differently than the Divine Manna of the Kingdom that could ONLY be imparted to man directly from the Logos — i.e., this Heavenly Spiritual Knowledge was called Gnosis.   Quoting from the Mystery Of The Gospel: The early Christian Valentinius quoted Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians when he made reference to Gnosis Kardias — or, the enlightened eyes of the heart.   “I pray also that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened in order that you may know the hope to which he has called you, the riches of his glorious inheritance in the saints” (Eph 1:18).   And that Paul wanted very much to speak about the Mystery of the Gospel to the Ephesians, but could not, is the reason he portrayed himself as an ambassador in bonds: “And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel, for which I am an ambassador in bonds: that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak” (see Eph 6:19-20).   And how did a seeker/disciple obtain these enlightened eyes of the heart?   Very briefly, by fulfilling the role of a virgin who awaits the Lord with the oil of purification — and by becoming the “good ground” that permits the necessary expansion of the facilities of mind to be brought about, which enables the seeker/disciple to be taught by the Indwelling Logos/Son of God/True Prophet.  (see True Prophet)
In your condition of abject ignorance, the Spiritual Knowledge that you portray as the enemy of Christianity, is the very Heavenly Divine Manna that nourishes the Christian seeking Spiritual Maturity and entrance into the Inner Kingdom (see The Third Fatal Mistake).     The Greek word Gnosis is indicative of that knowledge that cannot be taught by man — neither can it be found in any book or writing of man — it has absolutely nothing to do with any historical event or account — and is that Spiritual Knowledge or Divine Manna that can only be imparted to those who have become the “good ground” in the parable of the Sower And The Seed — and are therefore able to receive this Heavenly Knowledge directly from the Logos.  And what the scriptures are, when the Key of Knowledge is properly applied and turned within, is the knowledge and instruction necessary to open the “narrow strait gate” within your own mind and being, and gain entrance to the Inner Kingdom (see The Third Fatal Mistake).        
When the Gospel teaches to “remove the beam from your own eye, before attempting to remove the splinter from that of your brothers and sisters”, it is making reference to the fact that blind guides who have not themselves gained entrance to the Inner Kingdom and learned directly from the Logos/Son of God/True Prophet, should not be teaching others what they have failed to accomplish and experience within themselves.   Again quoting from :
It is man-made Church dogma that Jesus nailed the Law to the cross — dogma that is simply not supported by the Gospels.   And in accord with this man-made dogma, not only are Christians exempt from observing the Royal Law of God — but they dwell under the delusion that they have completed all Gospel requirements by merely saying their Jesus-prayer — after which they believe they have acquired eternal salvation apart from their actions thereafter.   And this dogma they embrace, even though it is totally rejected in the New Testament as seen in TheLie.org : “For it is impossible to restore again to repentance those who …then commit apostasy, since they crucify the Son of God on their own account and hold him up to contempt.. For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries.” (Heb 6:4-6;10:26-27 RSV).   And for these apostates to the Gospel to even imagine that they can understand the true meaning of the scriptures, is the second greatest accomplishment of that Power of the Left Hand which they call Satan.   The greatest accomplishment being the seduction of those who don’t believe that the god of this world even exists.   

In what has historically been portrayed as the authentic ending of the Gospel of Mark it reads: “This age of lawlessness and unbelieving lies under the say of Satan, who will not allow what lies under the unclean spirits to understand the truth and power of God”   Which is why modern Christians are blind to the spiritual meaning of the scriptures.   The Gospel of Mark then continues and declares: “I was delivered to death on behalf of sinners, that they might return to the truth and sin no more, that they might inherit that glory of righteousness which is spiritual and imperishable in heaven” (Moffatt, quoting Gospel Of Mark in Codex W; also quoted by St. Jerome as being the authrntic ending of the Gospel of Mark.    
The original Gospel message that became corrupted by the Gentile Church was not about a dispensation for the believer’s sin — but rather, the spiritual transformation of the faith-based believer into a spiritually mature disciple of TheWay.  Thus, Paul commands: “Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature” (Col 3:5 NIV).  If the congregation of believers could simply have faith, without living a Consecrated Life set apart from the thinking and lifestyle of the people of this world, then Paul would not have warned the believers of the simple faith that: “For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live” (Rom 8:13 KJV). That genuine Christians were to be set apart from the ways and thinking of this world can be seen in Paul’s admonition: “But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner — not even to eat with such a person. For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? But those who are outside God judges. Therefore ‘put away from yourselves the evil person'” (1 Cor 5:11-13 NKJ). 
That the modern Church has been led by blind guides who have promoted the Synagogue of Satan, and have crucified the Son of God afresh, is the true reality of the modern Church. 
GodSpeed in TheWay,
Nazirene
aka Brother of Jesus

0

Posted by on Jul 2, 2014

 

John 4:18-24 – The Divine Role Of Woman ̵ ... July 2, 2014

The Question posed to me that is relevant to all women: Hello, i was reading through john 4:18-24 and I don’t understand what Jesus is saying on line 22 about the Jews. I see what Jesus is saying about praying and worshiping the spirit of god not just on that mountain or in Jerusalem but always being in a conscious connection with god wherever we are… but what does this mean for that woman who has five husbands and her current husband that is not her husband? I think that maybe the knowledge Jesus is sharing women is a way of conveying that despite her unofficial marriages to 5 other men, the woman and husband can still redeem themselves if they follow in the way of Jesus..

The Answer To The Sexual Dilemma:

We are the prodigal sons of our Heavenly Father.   Other than some of my own, perhaps the best quote on the process of the Journey in TheWay is that out of the Zohar: “All souls are subject to the trials of transmigration; and men do not know the designs of the Most High with regard to them… The souls must re-enter the absolute substance whence they have emerged.  But to accomplish this end they must develop all the perfections, the germ of which is planted in them; and if they have not fulfilled this condition during one life, they must commence another, a third, and so forth, until they have acquired the condition which fits them for reunion with God”. 
  
In reality, it is impossible to develop all the perfections that will permit our Union with the Logos of God in one life — and when the Cosmology of Mind is rightly understood, the journey from the Alpha of Ignorance to the Omega of Enlightened Light and Being requires countless lifetimes of developing Wholeness, Completion and Perfection.  In the Edgar Cayce readings it was noted that the soul who lived as the historical man Jesus required 30 lifetimes to arrive at that point where he could achieve the Final State of Birth — but from my perspective, that number is allegorical — and it required more than that.   But he accomplished what he did by making each life a success story — i.e., understanding that each life has a higher purpose, and living one’s highest ideal in pursuit of that purpose.   
One of the gravest mistakes of the modern Church is to use Jesus as an excuse for their own carnal excess and the belief that they are somehow exempt from the consequences of their own actions — and one of the gravest mistakes of the New Age is to imagine that they can put off from one life to another.   A common New Age rhetorical reply is that they will deal with certain inconvenient issues in some future life rather than do the work, or make the sacrifice in the present.   The problem with this mindset is that when we attempt to put off till tomorrow what confronts or is presented to us in the present, the Laws will no longer present us with the opportunity at that level, and it will become much more difficult for us to return to that point where we are again even presented with the opportunity which we previously failed to take advantage of.  The fact of life is presented in the Gospel of the Nazirenes: “Don’t put off from day to day, and from cycle to cycle and æon to æon, in the belief, that when you return to this world you will succeed in gaining the mysteries , and entering into the kingdom of light. For you don’t know when the number of perfected souls will be filled up, and then the gates of the kingdom of light will be shut, and from hence none will be able to come in thereby, nor will any go forth. Strive that you may enter while the call is made, until the number of perfected souls will be sealed and complete, and the door is shut.”
The term “Strive that you may enter while the call is made…” is making reference to the parable of The Call — wherein, those who were invited to the Wedding Feast — indicating those who had achieved a level of spiritual maturity — but failed to come to TheCall — were destroyed — signifying that the Laws invoked greater hardship upon them who are presented with an opportunity, but they instead sought the entanglements of the ways of this world.  Again quoting the parable of the Talents out of the Nazirene Gospels in preference to the corrupted version in the traditional scriptures: “And that servant which knew his lord’s will and did not prepare himself, nor followed his will, will be beaten with many stripes. But he that did not know, and did commit things worthy of stripes, will be beaten with few stripes. For to whomsoever much is given, of him will they much require, and to whom they commit little, of him they will require the less.  For they who know the Godhead, and have found the way of life, the mysteries of light, and then have fallen into sin, shall be punished with greater chastisement than they who have not known the way of life.  Such shall return when their cycle is completed, and to them will be given space to consider, and amend their lives, and learning the mysteries, enter into the kingdom of light.”   The key statement is “…For they who know the Godhead, and have found the way of life, the mysteries of light, and then have fallen into sin, shall be punished with greater chastisement than they who have not known the way of life.”   Which means that the New Age rhetoric that the person will work on an aspect of self in some future life because it is not convenient for them at this time, will find that not only will they no longer have the opportunity in the future, but that it will become far more difficult to once again return to that point where they even had the opportunity.      
In the original uncorrupted Gospels there were may statements pertaining to seeking the knowledge of the Mysteries of Light — i.e., “…For they who know the Godhead, and have found the way of life, the mysteries of light”  — and this can be clarified by quoting the Pistis Sophia: “Do not cease seeking day or night, and do not let yourselves relax until you have found all the Mysteries of the Kingdom of Light, which will purify you and make you into Pure Light and lead you into the Kingdom of Light.”   And on the transformation of the physical body that permits the seeker to receive and comprehend the Higher Knowledge, the Pistis Sophia states: “Do not desist from seeking by day and by night, until you find the purifying mysteries of the light, which refine the body of matter and make it a pure light very refined.”   And just as important is the statement: “But if he shall have sinned once, twice, or thrice, they shall reject that soul, sending it back again into the world according to the form of the sins that it may have committed; the form whereof I will declare unto you hereafter.   But verily, verily I say unto you, that even the righteous man that hath committed no sin at all cannot be brought into the Kingdom of Light, forasmuch the seal of the mysteries of that kingdom is not found upon him.  Once for all, I say unto you, a soul cannot be brought into the kingdom, if it be without the mysteries of the Kingdom of the Light.”  And that this transformation of the self that brings about the necessary subsequent stages of birth can only be accomplished while in the physical body-vessel as stated in the Gospel of Philip: “Those who say that first they shall die and (then) they shall arise are confused. If they do not first receive the resurrection (while) they live, they will not receive anything (when) they die.”  Which means that absolutely no progress can be made when your time in the body has expired (physically died).   
Sexual pleasure and procreation is only one aspect of the purpose of the sex-centers of man and woman.   In fact, procreation can be portrayed as a holographic allegorical pattern of higher reality — portraying to the seeker the reality that only in the joining of the opposites (male/female, heaven/earth, spiritual/physical, positive/negative) can the third-force be conceived and evolved.   Again, holographically, in the same way that marriage does not make the two “one flesh” from the perspective that their male/female physical bodies are somehow altered — but rather, (holographically) the oneness is found in the genetics of their offspring (third-force).   The true merger of husband and wife into “one flesh” must be understood on the level of mind — wherein, the third-force that makes the male/female “one flesh” is best portrayed as the Morphic Field that surrounds and immersed the husband and wife within their own atmosphere-like Etheric Field — which is explored beginning at the subheading Gender-Blindness And The Process Of Birth.   Why is this even important?   The outer columns of the Tree of Life that form the Tree of Duality (aka Tree Of Knowledge Of Good And Evil) are male and female in relation to each other.   Therefore, the separate impressions and their corresponding divided male and female thought patterns and frequencies, are in fact the forbidden fruit of the Tree of Duality.   And it is in the joining and raising up of the male/female spheres of the Tree of Duality within the man and woman, that manifests and provides access to the fruit of the Tree of Life — the eater thereof inherits Eternal Life.   
Therefore, what exactly is a Morphic Field?   On the reality of what is portrayed as a Morphic Field, quoting from the excerpt of the book Active Consciousness – Awakening The Power Within, by Amy L. Lansky, it is stated that: “Biologist Rupert Sheldrake’s theory of morphic resonance also depends upon similarity in vibration. Members of the same species, being ‘on the same wavelength,’ are able to tap into information that pertains uniquely to them. And while members of an entire species might be able to tune into a fairly broad spectrum of frequencies (think of Carl Jung’s notion of the collective unconscious that humans supposedly tap into, smaller, more tightly connected groups — such as members of the same family or loving couples — resonate in more focused zones of vibration; they have access to their own “private frequency.’ In fact, Sheldrake goes even further and suggests that morphic fields can explain how human memory operates. Instead of being stored in our brains, he suggests that memories are stored in the morphic field. Our brains then pick them up via resonance, like radios tuning to their own private stations.”  Physical sex creates a permanent connection between a man and woman with the objective of the creation of an morphic-embryo that can be evolved by the two (husband and wife) into a higher state of birth.   And this is demonstrated in the Gospel of Thomas in the statement: They said to him, “Shall we then, as children, enter the kingdom?” Jesus said to them, “When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female”.  By creating that morphic field where the third-force is evolved and balanced, the higher soul-self that is asexual can manifest in the physical — thereby enabling the man and woman and their higher soul-selves to evolve towards the next level of spiritual birth — with the ultimate objective of attaining Oneness in the Final Birth which manifests the Logos in the Union.   
The soul or our higher True-Self is neither male or female because the polarities of male/female exist in a united reality.   The soul itself IS the third-force balance between the physical and spiritual natures — which are portrayed as the two sons in the parable of the prodigal son — the younger son venturing into this, the Far Country — with the elder son remaining in the fields of the Kingdom of God.   From the perspective of the higher soul-self, the prodigal son is feminine in relation to the indwelling spiritual nature which is male.   The soul is a Being of Light ( http://BeingOfLight.com ) that is neither male nor female, because it exists as the Morphic Field that is the third-force balance of the physical (female) and spiritual (male) natures.   That there are males in this world is only because the holographic nature of the Divine Pattern which is replicated into all of Creation must be maintained.   But in this case, a man is only male in his relationship to woman.   This can be understood in the feminine genetics of “XX” — which can be broken down to chromosomes from the father and separate chromosomes from the mother. Yet, even though the 23 chromosomes were derived from the father, they are only male in relation to the 23 chromosomes from the mother.   On a physical level of being, while the man is male in relation to woman, both are holographically feminine in relation to the inner spiritual nature that remains attached to the Kingdom — with the third-force balance observed in the Light and reality of the higher soul-self.   
In order to evolve, these male/female polarities must be separated so they can interact and evolve.   In order for the soul or soul-self to evolve, there had to be a division between the spiritual and physical natures as portrayed in the parable of the two sons.   Holographically, in order for the prodigal son to evolve, there had to be the division of male and female.   Thus, before conception can even take place in the physical, both the sperm and ovum must divide and split so the opposites can join and create an embryo which evolves into a fetus with the objective of initiating birth into the next level of being — which in this case is physical existence.   But because the process of birth must be accomplished incrementally and in stages, at each level of birth you are holographically born as an ovum or sperm on that level of being.   And this (holographic Divine Pattern) reality of man and woman is explored in the subheading Cosmic Ovum And Sperm.  While on a physical level only one ovum and sperm can unite to conceive a human embryo, this is not the case on the next level (human reality).   Quoting the above: “…think of Carl Jung’s notion of the collective unconscious that humans supposedly tap into, smaller, more tightly connected groups“ — and on our level, whoever you have sex with remains connected to you in a quasi-morphic field — creating an exchange of impressions which we often receive as thoughts.   
Woman is structured to raise up the vital life-force passed to her during sex, and return it back to her husband at a higher level — which is why man is polarized positive in the genitals, while woman is polarized positive at the breasts.  It has been noted that woman alone maintains enlarged breasts which is not the case in the animal kingdom where the primary function of the breasts is the nursing of offspring.   Unlike the animal kingdom, the breasts of woman remain enlarged in order to serve the higher purpose of the Marriage — which Divine Union can only be manifest in the kingdom of mankind.   In the parable, the prodigal son is portrayed as loosing his (divine) inheritance by living a “riotous” lifestyle — which in the loss of his inheritance, places him under the control of the Citizen of the Far Country.   What we portray as nature-man squanders away his inheritance (vital life-force) — a process with Gurdjieff portrays nature-man as a type of herd-beast that feeds nature through the loss of his bio-energy.   If man is celibate, then his level of bio-energy dwindles — i.e., you loose what you don’t use.   Also, as explored in The Way Of The Monk, there is a holographic division of heavenly/spiritual and physical/earthly in the upper three spiritual centers (aka chakras) and the lower three earthly centers within man — with the third-force in the Center.   So, if you negate the lower, then you can’t bring about the necessary merger of male/female opposites within self — and therefore you can’t manifest an evolved third-force in the Center — creating an imbalanced condition which we portray as chakra-gazing and head-sex.  Again, quoting the Nazirene Gospel: And one of the disciples asked him, “How shall a man enter into the Kingdom?” And he answered and said, “If you don’t make below as the above, and the left as the right, and the behind as the before, entering into the center and passing into the spirit, you will not enter into the kingdom of God.” — with the objective being that the Kingdom can only be entered through the CENTER — which is dependent upon the evolved balance of the three upper spiritual (male) centers and the three lower (female) spiritual centers with the evolution of the Center.   Which means that by denying the lower centers through celibacy, those centers fail to develop. 
When rightly understood, the organs of the body itself is the epitome of duality working in harmonic conjunction with each other — i.e., the two lungs, the two hemispheres of the brain, the two sides of the heart, the two ovaries or testis, the two eyes, ears, nostrils, arms, legs, kidneys and most other organs.   Taking the heart as an example, if the two sides which each contain an upper and lower chamber fail to function together in harmony, then the heart and the body becomes dysfunctional — with physical death a possibility.   Holographically, man and woman are opposite polarities that are the two sides of the whole — and each has an upper (spiritual/heavenly) chamber, and a lower (earthly) chamber.   When they function in harmony and oneness, the vital life-force is passed from the lower chamber of the male into the lower nature of the female, is raised up into the upper chamber of the female where she is polarized positive at the breasts, and passed back to the husband at that (upper) level where he is polarized negative — and this higher raised up bio-energy then has the potential to be raised up and join the upper and lower within the two — evolving the Center where Wholeness can be matured and manifested.   This, of course, is the design of Nature and the Laws Thereof — and in the joining of the two, the Morphic-Field of the union of the two evolves the embryo which permits the next stage of birth to be brought about at that higher level.   
Man, though, must have freewill — and in his pursuit of the pleasures and appetites of sexual interaction apart from the higher purpose of sex as a uniting force that bring wholeness to the male/female embryo in the morphic-field, nature man uses the sex organs strictly for pleasure and the feeding of his carnal appetites.   With the result of squandering away his vital life-force into the feeding of nature, with him as a type of herd-beast of the god of this world.   In the same way that woman craves the exchange of vital life-force from the man, the man desires the return of that vital life-force from woman — which he is deprived of, because this can only be accomplished by a wife who is totally bonded and at-one with her husband.   The heart has a common beat in which the four chambers perform unique tasks that manifest wholeness.   In order to function above the physical level, the man and woman who are Husband and Wife must have a common beat that moves, sustains and raises up the bio-energy to make the evolved Morphic-Field connect them to the higher reality of their souls.   Nature man is incapable of this common beat and exchange of bio-energy and impressions at a higher level that unites the left/right and higher/lower into Oneness.   So nature-man goes through life in a spiritual void — fixated on the breasts of woman — desiring the bio-energy which he cannot receive from just any woman.   And because he can’t get this energy from one woman, he spends his existence being attracted to the breast of many woman — never receiving what he craves and needs to achieve wholeness.   And this attraction to women’s breasts is why Jesus said that a man who looks on a woman with lust, has already committed adultery with her in his heart.   And why the woman who was caught in adultery was told to go and sin no more.   When rightly understood, Jesus was of course expressing the reality of the Natural Laws of God — and these Laws are not negated because of one’s dogmatic beliefs.    
As a woman, the question becomes what you bring to the table of a marriage.   If you have already given yourself to other men, then it becomes very difficult for you to raise up the bio-energy of one man and return it back to him as per the Divine Design and the Laws of Creation.  Instead of reflecting and completing the impressions of your husband through the merger and raising up with your own impressions, you are reflecting the impressions of many men who are neither your own, nor can you affect in a higher positive manner (see The Merger Of Opposites Into One, and The Holographic Pattern Of Sex).  Man and woman each emit opposite polarity impressions (see Impressions As Food) — and it is the interaction and merger of male/female impressions that nourish the mind in its embryonic stages of development within the marriage and merger of opposites.   But if the woman is a part of a morphic-field with many men, then it becomes very difficult to near impossible for her to fulfill her divine role and reflect and raise up the impressions of her husband.   In like manner, a man who has a harem of women, has too much bio-energy bleeding off into nature.   And this was why the woman at the well was portrayed as having five husband and none of her own — and therefore she could not return with Her Husband and receive the Living Waters of the Spirit.   
                     
There is no doubt that we live in defiled times — and few of us have escaped the cesspool that we have been plunged into.   But there is the Law of Grace — and the fact that if we see the error of our ways, and strive to make change in first ourselves, and then in the outer world, then a certain degree of healing can take place within us.   A young girl who is seduced by our culture into having an abortion, can only repent from murdering the unborn, by assisting other young girls into not making the same mistake.   In the same way, a woman who has been seduced by our culture into having a multitude of sex partners, can begin the healing process by seeing the error of her ways — and conveying to other young girls not to permit themselves to be seduced and entrapped.   The god of this world which is portrayed as the Citizen of the Far Country, wants young women to have a multitude of sexual partners, so that she is unable to fulfill her Divine Purpose as a Wife — and therefore, bleed the vital life-force off into nature — i.e., serving in the role of a herd-beast.   But the Law of Grace can only be invoked by repentance — and repentance must be founded upon the making of amends.   And this can only be accomplished by positively affecting the lives of others.       

0

Posted by on Jul 2, 2014

 

Cosmos – Giordano Bruno – The Great Lie ... July 2, 2014

Having watched the new television series Cosmos – A Space Odyssey which was advertised to present the vision of the Universe of Giordano Bruno, the only reason that Giordano Bruno was even mentioned, was to demonstrate how wrong the medieval …

0

Posted by on Jul 2, 2014

 

Barack Obama – Social Equality And Justice &# ... July 2, 2014

Tonight Barack Obama will give his State of the Union Address — and to embrace reality, I suggest that Obama should inform the people that he is going to write an executive order suspending gravity, so that the American People will no longer be restra…

0

Posted by on Jul 2, 2014

 

O’Reilly vs Duck Dynasty July 2, 2014

While I can’t say that Bill O’Reilly’s recent coverage of the Duck Dynasty fiasco was negative, he raised a number of points that failed to put the issues in their proper perspective.   Generally, Phil Robertson was portrayed as a Fundamentalist who promoted outdated biblical morality.   Yet, if it is true that the Gospels were written by Godly Enlightened men, can their Wisdom be outdated?  Can Truth be outdated?  Twice Mr. O’Reilly mentioned the condemnation of homosexuality as stemming from the Old Testament — and yet, it was the New Testament — 1st Corinthians — that Phil Robertson was in fact quoting in the statement: “Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers — they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. … Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.”

O’Reilly then seemed to find fault with Phil Robertson’s statements, and quoted Luke 6:37: “Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven”.  But in not understanding the biblical mandate of discernment vs judgement, the whole issue of sin became clouded.   Was Phil Robertson condemning?  Or was he expressing the need for discernment —  sharing important facts about the very purpose and objective of the life that all of mankind is presently living?  Thus, with respect to the necessity of proper discernment, the Apostle Paul also wrote in 1st Corinthians: “… I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner — not even to eat with such a person.  For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? But those who are outside God judges. Therefore ‘put away from yourselves the evil person’.”  If we are not to keep company with anyone “…who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner”, then the ability to discern what the Gospels portray as sin, is of the utmost importance.  
 
When it is recognized that the statement in Corinthians quoted by Phil Robertson was as much a polemic against heterosexual infidelity as it was homosexuality, a wise man would want to know: Why does the scriptures impose such strict biblical-based morality upon mankind?   To the degree that adultery and sex outside of marriage are condemned — to the degree that men were told by Jesus that they have already committed adultery if they look upon another woman with lust in their heart?   Further, to the woman caught in adultery, Jesus warned: “…go and sin no more'” (John 8:2-11 NKJ).    Why?   Perhaps the answer lies with what biblical experts confirmed in their excavation of the Dead Sea Scrolls — i.e., that post-Nicene Christianity has virtually nothing in common with the actual first century teachings of Jesus (see The First Fatal Mistake) — which was a religion of transformation where the lost prodigal son gained entrance to the Inner Kingdom (see The Third Fatal Mistake).   And in all instances where Jesus was asked how to enter the Kingdom, his answer was virtually the same — i.e., in the Second Epistle of Clement: “Let us expect, therefore, hour by hour, the kingdom of God in love and righteousness, since we know not the day of the appearing of God. For the Lord Himself, being asked by one when His kingdom would come, replied, ‘When two shall be one, that which is without as that which is within, and the male with the female, neither male nor female’”      
How could this be?  The question should be posed?   When Paul stated that the followers of Jesus were exempt from the (outward ritual) works of the Law of Moses, this is true.   But Paul also stated that the Law of Moses was an allegorical portrayal of the Royal Law that must be fulfilled within the life of the sincere believer.   And it was the proper application of theKey Of Knowledge that would open the inner “narrow strait gate” to the Kingdom (see The Key Of Knowledge And The Cosmology Of Mind).   Thus, Jesus commanded those who would be his followers: “And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?” (Luke 6:46 KJV).   And this is why Jesus warned those who would claim to believe in his teachings: “And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it” (Matt 10:38-39 NKJ).   That the sincere believers in the Gospel teachings were to be in the world and not of it — and to travail in TheWay and transform their lives and become what is portrayed in the previous link as the Final Living Temple — and to have no part in the sin of this world — is very clearly stated in the words of Paul who warned: “For it is impossible to restore again to repentance those who …then commit apostasy, since they crucify the Son of God on their own account and hold him up to contempt.. For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries.” (Heb 6:4-6;10:26-27 RSV – see TheLie.org).  If adultery is sin as Jesus stated, can those who willfully commit adultery “…after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful prospect of judgment“.   And Christians are warned by the Apostle Paul to have nothing to do with the “sexually immoral, …put away from yourselves the evil person.”  What Phil Robertson was correctly pointing out is the fact that we presently dwell in a culture that is based upon sexual immorality. 

In light of the above profound warning to complacent believers who call upon the Lord with their lips, while failing to live in accord with his Commandments, a sincere seeker would want to know:  How is that condition achieved where “…the male with the female, neither male nor female’”??? And, it must be noted, that unless this condition where the duality of male and female is overcome and wholeness is achieved, the Epistle of Clement which directly quotes the teachings of Jesus that were evidently removed from the Gospels (seeBibleCorruption.com), conveys to the believer that the Kingdom cannot come outwardly where carnal men look for it — because it is within you (Luke 17:20-21). Thus, where Jesus taught that one must achieve the next stage of birth to enter the Kingdom, this overcoming of the duality of male and female has little to do with the civil ordained unions of man and woman in this world — but rather, the subsequent stages of Marriage and secondary birth that modern man does not at all understand the higher reality of. But even more revealing is the similar teaching that has been preserved in the recently recovered Gospel of Thomas where the disciples as Jesus: “Shall we then, as children, enter the kingdom?”   Wherein Jesus teaches when the Kingdom will come (within you): “When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female…” Which provokes the question: how can “you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female…”?   The answer is found in what Jesus taught as Wholeness — and the fact that man and woman are half of each other, and must not only be reunited as ONE — but a Divine Marriage must be instituted and evolved where the two become “one flesh” (Matt 19:5; Mark 10:8) — physically, mentally and spiritually.   And when rightly understood, these verses are not making reference to procreation — but rather, the total integration of male/female on all levels of their being in Absolute Oneness — allegorically reuniting Adam and Eve within the construct of the Consecrated Divine Marriage.    Which means that Marriage itself is a Religious Sacrament — and the vast majority of marriages ordained by the authorities of this world, are little more than stated licensed sex and cohabitation. 

Discernment was of paramount importance to the original disciples of Jesus — and this is especially seen in the statement to the person who Jesus healed: “…sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee” (John 5:14 KJV).   And what this means is that those who sin — especially after coming to the knowledge of the Gospel message — inherit a fate even worse than before they were healed from their sin. To the degree that Paul warned the congregation of believers: , “Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows” (Gal 6:7 NIV).   The Question is: How does a man reap what he has sown?   
 
In the coverage of Phil Robertson Bill O’Reilly portrayed himself as a kind of authority who wrote a book on the life of Jesus.   Taking into account the absolute need for discernment, the proper question that should be posed would be parallel to that in John 9 where it was asked in a discerning manner: “Teacher, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born homosexual?”   And while not righly understood today, this question is well represented in what can be portrayed at the subheading, The Biblical Foundational Mindset.   Did the Jews in the first century believe in the pre-existent soul?  As stated in The Hastings-Scribner Dictionary Of The Bible (New York, 1903. Bk 4, p. 63) “To affirm that Jews in Christ’s time did not believe in pre-existence is simply incorrect”.   Which means that the discernment raised by Phil Robertson with respect to the plight of the homosexual is of paramount importance for all people today to understand.
When rightly understood, Phil Robertson wasn’t judging and condemning anyone — as suggested by Bill O’Reilly and many of his critics.   What Phil Robertson was in fact doing was warning others about the pitfalls of certain behavior which the scriptures portray as immoral and ungodly.   In the words of the Apostle Paul: “Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows” (Gal 6:7 NIV) — which can also be portrayed in the words: “Teacher, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born homosexual?”   And this biblically based reality is explored in the subheading The Conditions Of One’s Birth.   And if we ask the question as to why this biblical teaching is not understood today?   The answer is, because the modern Church has shackled itself in the abyss of a Spiritual Diaspora of ignorance, because of its perpetuation of The Religion Of Roman Emperors.

When Bill O’Reilly first announced that he was writing a book, The Killing Of Jesus, I hoped that he would open the Pandora’s Box of the Christian world and reveal the original Gospel teachings that were suppressed by the secular politics of the Roman Church.   The original disciples who walked and talked with the historical man Jesus daily, did not believe that he was God — but very much a true holy man who fulfilled the Royal Law of God within himself, and became At-One with the Indwelling Logos.    Quoting from The Foundational Paradigm Of Mind And Being:  Jesus was a man who became the Anointed (Messiah/Christ) at his baptism in the Jordan (see The Ten Words), the Church corrupted the very words of God spoken to mankind — because they were too carnal to comprehend the original teachings respecting the man Jesus who was in“…supernatural union of a man and God… In their eyes, Jesus of Nazareth was a mere mortal, the legitimate son of Joseph and Mary: but he was the best and wisest of the human race, selected as the worthy instrument to restore upon earth the worship of the true and supreme Deity. When he was baptized in the Jordan, the Christ, the first of the aeons, the Son of God himself, descended on Jesus in the form of a dove, to inhabit his mind, and direct his actions during the allotted period of his ministry” (Gibbon; The Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire, V.4, P.366).   Or that Jesus was the example and pattern for all of mankind because in the original teachings of the Gospel, Jesus was portrayed as being “…justified by fulfilling the Law. He was the Christ of God, since not one of the rest of mankind had observed the Law completely. Had any one else fulfilled the commandments of the Law, he would have been the Christ.” Hence “when [believers] thus fulfill the law, they are able to become Christs, for they assert that our Lord Himself was a man in like sense with all humanity.”  (Hippolytus, Refut. Omn. Haer. vii. 34).    That the majority of Gentile Christians were too carnal in their thinking, mindset and lifestyle to understand this essential original teaching of the Gospel, is because they could not conceive of the reality that the mind of man is segmented into levels of higher and lower fragmented consciousness that alienates man not only from the inner Kingdom, but the higher reality of his own soul — and ultimately God. 

In 2nd Corinthians Paul confirms the reality that there exists deeper levels of consciousness within the mind of man, and relates the account of being taken up in spirit to the Heavenly Kingdom where he witnessed mysteries which are inconceivable to the faith-based congregation of believers.   Quoting the article Opening The Eyes Of The Heart: If it is true that there are higher realities of being that are totally inconceivable to the mind of the undeveloped faith-based believer (see  Mysteries Of The Gospel) — and by virtue of their immaturity, the biblical authors were powerless to explain in detail many of the important Gospel teachings and concepts — then the spiritually mature author’s of the scriptures who do Know of these higher realities, remain virtually powerless to do anything more than to provide the people with a list of do’s and don’ts, so that the immature Christians will be in a position where they are then better able to evolve to a mature understanding and comprehension of the teachings of Jesus and TheWay.  To totally ignore these do’s and don’ts, without knowing the consequence of one’s choices and actions, is paramount to walking out onto a freeway blindfolded. 

What this means is that Phil Robertson was promoting Gospel-discernment when he expressed the importance of maintaining biblical morality.   In fact, if Phil Robertson was of a more mature spiritual understanding, he would have explained about The Esoteric Reality Of Virginity And Sex — and he would have enlightened the people about The Holographic Pattern Of Sex that is the basis of the biblical prohibitions and morality that the people in our modern culture find outdated.   And while it is true that as a faith-based Christian that Phil Robertson does not possess this higher understanding that has been suppressed by the Church of Rome, it is also true that Phil Robertson is wise and insightful enough not to violate the do’s and don’ts set forth in the Gospels.   For greater understanding, click on the below links for a more in-depth exploration of the relationship of sexual morality and gaining entrance to the Kingdom within.

GodSpeed in TheWay,

Brother of Yeshua/Jesus

The Esoteric Feminine Mystique

 

0

Posted by on Jul 2, 2014